The Methodology of Social Judgement Theory

Download Free PDF View PDF

Download Free PDF View PDF

The Lens Model Equation (Tucker, 1964) quantifies the judge-environment interactions expressed as judgment achievement and reveals the underlying sources of judgment achievement. Since Tucker’s publication (1964), there has been no comprehensive review of the literature applying the Lens Model Equation to individuals, i.e. idiographic approach. By describing and analysing variations of individual data this review shows, by means of a meta- analysis, restricted to idiographic studies, the importance of focusing on the idiographic approach, which is mostly neglected by research on judgment and decision-making. Consequently, only 14 of 34 studies, using an idiographic approach, were included in our review. The findings of 263 judgment achievements, analysed by our meta-analysis, led to the conclusion that, generally speaking, our individuals judge a given criterion moderately well. Furthermore, the high error-free judgment achievements of most of our judges imply that there often is ro.

Download Free PDF View PDF

Annual Review of Psychology

Download Free PDF View PDF

Download Free PDF View PDF

Successful decision making involves our ability to understand the intensions, emotions and beliefs of other people. An important feature of decision making in a social setting concern the interaction of areas and Social cognition is an integral part of social psychology, which deals with the psychological mechanisms that mediate the individual's responses to the social environment. Notable to social cognitive theories are the ideas which are applied and extended to many concepts, theories, models and paradigms from cognitive psychology in social context. This approach leads to remarkable progress in understanding of social scenario, people's decisions and also offers insights into social issues. It helps to understand reactions of people in social context. Decision making is just one of the many areas in which social cognition has an important role. Decision making is a complex cognitive skill. Social cognition attempts to explain the broad social aspects of human experience, such as how decision making are influenced by the presence of others as well as the social situations in which they find themselves. This article presents a fundamental idea of social cognitive perspective of decision making process and factors that influence our decisions. In our everyday life very often we seek for others opinions on a particular matter before come to any decision or even sometimes unconsciously we go with the flow of our surrounding while making choices. This is because decisions are not made independently, as each decision point is influenced by information that is received from the society where we live. The social context thus often exerts an influence on our decisions because we have or at least we think we will have to publicly justify our decisions to confirm moral and social norms. Hence, on the basis of such information which individuals acquire, store, process and act on from the environment decisions are made (Turpin and Marais 2006). This is the fundamental aspect of social cognition that deals with the psychological mechanisms to mediate the individual's responses in social settings and decision making is one of them.

Download Free PDF View PDF

We are delighted to invite you to join us at the First Meeting of the Society for the Advancement of Judgment and Decision Making Studies (SEJyD), taking place on July 12-13, 2016. The conference will be held in Palma (Majorca, Spain), at the CaixaForum Gran Hotel, one of the most spectacular examples of modernist architecture in Mallorca, located in the historical town center. The First Meeting aims to be a new and exciting forum to communicate and discuss your findings, either through an oral presentation or a poster. The meeting's topics include the following: 1. Neural basis of judgment and decision making 2. Moral judgment 3. Preferences, aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgment 4. Decision making in the field of sport 5. Decision making in the field of consumer behaviour (*we encourage contributions related to tourism consumption) 6. Open Communications (related to JDM) In addition to the scheduled plenary lectures by Martin Skov, Konstantinos Katsikopoulos, Wandi Bruine de Bruin, and Todd Hare, to the applied workshop, and to the panel discussion, the scientific program includes two poster sessions, and six thematic sessions (for oral presentations) in which your valuable submissions will be much appreciated. Advances in basic or applied research, reports of empirical results, developments in theory and methodological papers are all welcome. We encourage submissions from different fields, or from interdisciplinary research groups, mainly, but not exclusively, related to experimental, social, clinical and applied psychology,

Download Free PDF View PDF